Conagra Brands, Inc.
CAG Consumer Defensive · Packaged FoodsFairly valued.
Conagra posts $1.92 billion net loss in fiscal 2026 as revenue falls 2.9%
The four readings.
What the filing actually says.
Read together, the filings show a sharp drop in reported profit in fiscal 2026 alongside a weaker balance sheet. Revenue declined 2.9% to $11.28 billion, but the move to a $1.92 billion net loss is far larger than the revenue change would suggest, so the loss is the item that needs explaining. Total assets fell to $17.27 billion from $20.93 billion, and liabilities to $10.92 billion. The forensic scores should be read one at a time. The Beneish M-Score is -3.530, below the -1.78 threshold and not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone. This is a screening output, and a non-elevated reading does not confirm that reported figures are accurate. The Altman Z″-Score is 0.65, which falls in the distress zone; lower values indicate more financial stress, and the zone is an estimate, not a forecast of default. The Piotroski F-Score is 5 of 9 computable signals, where a higher count means stronger results on a checklist of profitability, leverage, and efficiency tests, so 5 sits in the middle. The Fog Index is 16.36, in the hard-to-read band of 14 to 18, so the MD&A demands careful reading. The operating cash flow to net income ratio of -0.73 is negative only because net income is negative. The filings name specific exposures: wheat, corn, vegetable oils, pork, dairy, and tinplate steel for canned packaging, the last affected by tariffs. A hypothetical 10% move in agriculture commodity prices would produce a potential gain or loss of $11.0 million on related contracts. The 10-Q reports no material changes to risk factors. Readers may want to look at Note 16 of the 10-K and Note 12 of the 10-Q for legal contingency detail, which the excerpt does not reproduce.
Catalyst.Revenue for fiscal 2026 (ended May 31, 2026) was $11.28 billion, down from $11.61 billion in fiscal 2025, a 2.9% decline. The fiscal 2026 result includes an operating loss of $1.63 billion, compared with operating income of $1.36 billion a year earlier. The focus named in the risk factors is offsetting cost pressure: the company anticipates continued elevated input cost inflation in fiscal 2027 and plans to respond through productivity gains, cost cuts, pricing, and hedging. In the first quarter of fiscal 2027 (ended August 30, 2026), the company repurchased 2,662,660 shares, leaving about $793.6 million under its repurchase authorization. The excerpt provided does not include the MD&A results discussion that would explain the drivers of the fiscal 2026 loss.
Hidden risk.The most easily missed item is the swing from profit to loss: net income moved from $1.15 billion in fiscal 2025 to a loss of $1.92 billion in fiscal 2026, while operating cash flow stayed positive at $1.4 billion. Equity fell from $8.93 billion to $6.36 billion over the same year. Long-term debt on the annual balance sheet is $6.46 billion, while the 10-Q reports a carrying amount of $7.73 billion including current installments, and a 1% rise in interest rates would decrease the fair value of fixed-rate debt by approximately $318.0 million. The excerpt does not state what caused the loss, so readers may want to look at the full 10-K for that explanation.
What traders are betting.
The metric
Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.
- Shares sold short
- 39.2M
- Change since Aug 31
- −16.2%
- Days to cover
- 3.1
What it tells us
A large group of traders is betting that CAG shares will fall. That is a strong negative view, and also a crowd that would have to buy shares back if the price rises.
Short sellers closed some of their bets: shares sold short fell 16.2% since the Aug 31 report.
At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 3.1 days to buy back every borrowed share.
How investors use it
- Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
- Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
- Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
- Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.
Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement
The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Conagra Brands filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.
- Sep 30, 202610-QQuarterly report (2026-08-30)Period: 2026-08-300EDGAR →
- Sep 30, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-09-30)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0EDGAR →
- Sep 28, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-09-23)Item 5.07: Shareholder vote results0EDGAR →
- Aug 11, 2026DEF 14AProxy statement (2026-09-23)0EDGAR →
- Jul 28, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-07-28)Item 1.01: Signed a material agreement; Item 2.03: New debt or other financial obligation; Item 8.01: Other eventsEDGAR →★ Curriculum-relevant
- Jul 28, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directorsEDGAR →★ Curriculum-relevant
- Jul 15, 20268-KCurrent reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0EDGAR →
- Jul 15, 202610-KAnnual report (2026-05-31)Period: 2026-05-310EDGAR →
- May 7, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-05-05)Item 5.03: Charter or bylaw change; fiscal-year change0EDGAR →
- Apr 13, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-04-08)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors; Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0EDGAR →
- Apr 1, 202610-QQuarterly report (2026-02-22)Period: 2026-02-220EDGAR →
- Apr 1, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-04-01)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0EDGAR →
If this case caught your eye
Financial Shenanigans
Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.
View on Amazon →The Interpretation of Financial Statements
The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.
View on Amazon →Quality of Earnings
Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.
View on Amazon →