Conagra Brands, Inc.
CAG Consumer Defensive · Packaged FoodsFairly valued.
Fairly Valued (Neutral) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.
What the filing actually says.
Conagra Brands’ 2026 10-Q indicates a contraction in net sales for both the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended February 22, 2026. For the shorter period, net sales registered $2,787.8 million, a decrease from $2,841.0 million in the comparable prior-year period. Over the thirty-nine weeks, the trend continued, with net sales falling to $8,399.5 million from $8,831.0 million. The filing’s “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section refers readers to the prior 10-K for additional information on market risks, suggesting no material changes in these exposures during the current reporting period.
For this reading, the standard forensic accounting scores are not available. This includes the Beneish M-Score (Beneish, 1999) — an eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector — which typically flags elevated risk above -1.78. Similarly, Altman Z″ (Altman, 1968) — a bankruptcy-distress index — which categorizes companies into distress (<1.10), grey (1.10–2.60), or safe (>2.60) zones, is not provided. The Piotroski F-Score (Piotroski, 2000) — a 9-point fundamental strength scan — which indicates weak performance below 4, is also absent. Finally, the Fog Index (Gunning, 1952) — a readability score where 18+ suggests obfuscation — cannot be calculated without the text.
Item 7 of the 10-Q identifies the company’s principal market risks as price fluctuations of commodity and energy inputs, interest rates, and foreign currencies. For a packaged foods company, these commodity inputs—such as wheat, corn, vegetable oils, pork, and dairy products—represent direct costs of goods sold. While the filing states no material changes in these risks during the thirty-nine weeks ended February 22, 2026, the ongoing exposure to volatility in these essential components remains a fundamental operational consideration. The brevity of the discussion, deferring to the prior 10-K for details, implies a stable risk profile for the quarter, but not an absence of inherent market sensitivity.
This filing provides a snapshot of Conagra’s recent sales performance and reiterates its primary market risk exposures. It confirms a decline in net sales for the reported periods and highlights the company’s sensitivity to commodity and energy price fluctuations, as well as interest rates and foreign currencies. What this specific 10-Q does not offer, however, are the quantitative forensic scores that would allow for a more granular assessment of potential accounting anomalies or financial distress. Without these metrics, the reading remains focused on the stated operational trends and risk disclosures, rather than deeper analytical insights into the company’s financial health or disclosure practices.
Filing timeline
- May 7, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-05-05)### Item 5.03 Amendments to Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws; Change in Fiscal Year . On May 5, 2026, the Board of Directors of Conagra Brands, Inc. (the “0Read →
- Apr 13, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-04-08)### Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers 0Read →
- Apr 1, 20268-KMaterial event (2026-04-01)### Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition On April 1, 2026, Conagra Brands, Inc . (the “Company”) issued a press release which contained inf0Read →
- Apr 1, 202610-QQuarterly report (2026-02-22)Period: 2026-02-220Read →
- Aug 6, 2025DEF 14AProxy statement (2025-09-17)0Read →
- Jul 10, 202510-KAnnual report (2025-05-25)Period: 2025-05-250Read →
If this case caught your eye
Financial Shenanigans
Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.
View on Amazon →The Interpretation of Financial Statements
The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.
View on Amazon →Quality of Earnings
Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.
View on Amazon →