Avery Dennison Corporation

AVY Consumer Cyclical · Packaging & Containers
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$175.88
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$152.42 — $199.54
-12% from high
Market cap
13.3B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
2.3%
P/E
19.3
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Deep value.

Avery Dennison's 2026 cash flow rebound leans on working-capital timing and rising debt.

Bullish Altman Z″: 3.49Piotroski: 4/9Fog: 17.2
RED DEEP 76 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
3.49
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
4
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
Fog Index MD&A readability
17.16
Dense
8 threshold ≥ 18 = murky 24
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

Avery Dennison's filings describe a company rebuilding volume and margin after a near-flat 2025, but the numbers support a mixed reading. Revenue for 2025 was $8.86 billion, up 1.1% from $8.76 billion, while net income fell to $688 million from $704.9 million. Operating cash flow of $881.4 million covered net income about 1.28 times, but it was down from $938.8 million in 2024. The forensic scores point in different directions. The Beneish M-Score of -2.549 is below the -1.78 threshold and sits outside the elevated manipulation-risk zone; that is a screening result, not proof that the reporting is clean. The Altman Z″-Score of 3.49 is in the safe zone, meaning the model does not flag near-term distress. The Piotroski F-Score is 5 of 9 computable signals, a mid-range count that shows neither broad strength nor broad weakness across the profitability, leverage and efficiency checks it uses. The Fog Index of 17.16 falls in the hard-to-read band, which matters because the 2026 cash and restructuring explanations sit in dense text. On the business side, the risk factors tie results to tariffs on goods from Canada, Mexico, China and the European Union, the U.S. Supreme Court's February 20, 2026 IEEPA ruling, and emerging-market exposure, with about 40% of 2025 net sales from those markets. Management says direct tariff effects have not been significant after mitigating actions, though indirect demand effects remain uncertain. Readers may want to look at the working-capital and incentive-compensation discussion in the 10-Q cash flow section alongside the 10-K balance sheet, where debt rose to $3.2 billion from $2.55 billion.

Catalyst.Management's 2026 story is volume-led growth and cost recovery. In the six months ended June 30, 2026, net sales rose 9% (6% excluding currency, 4% organic), with the company citing higher volume partly offset by unfavorable mix and raw-material deflation price reductions. Second-quarter net sales reached $2,462.9 million versus $2,220.5 million, and net income for the first six months rose to approximately $372 million from approximately $355 million. The filing credits productivity gains from restructuring, a net pricing and raw-material benefit, and favorable currency translation. The 2026 outlook also flags higher interest expense and a full-year effective tax rate in the high-twenty percent range.

Hidden risk.The largest tension is between the cash-flow rebound and its sources. Operating cash flow for the first six months of 2026 rose to $544.7 million from $192.5 million, but management attributes the increase primarily to changes in operational working capital and lower incentive compensation payments, both of which can reverse. Full-year 2025 operating cash flow was $881.4 million, down from $938.8 million in 2024, while long-term debt climbed from $2.55 billion to $3.2 billion after the €500 million of senior notes issued in September 2025. Restructuring continues, with $34.7 million recorded in the first half of 2026 tied to about 600 positions. The risk factors also note that about 69% of 2025 net sales originated outside the U.S.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what AVY reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
3.0%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
2M
Change since Aug 31
−26.3%
Days to cover
1.7

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against AVY. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Short sellers closed some of their bets: shares sold short fell 26.3% since the Aug 31 report.

At normal trading volume, short sellers could buy back every borrowed share in under two days.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly report & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly report (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Avery Dennison filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Oct 13, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-10-09)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Oct 5, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-09-30)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 19, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-08-18)Item 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 4, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-06-30)Period: 2026-06-300
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 30, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 12, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-04-30)0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 25, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →