Arista Networks, Inc.

ANET Technology · Computer Hardware
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$185.58
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$114.52 — $217.41
-15% from high
Market cap
234.1B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
—
No dividend declared
P/E
58.5
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Fairly valued.

Arista's revenue rose 28.6% to $9.01 billion, while liabilities grew faster than assets.

Neutral Beneish: -2.25Altman Z″: 8.46Piotroski: 5/9Fog: 22.4
RED DEEP 67 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.25
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
8.46
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
5
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
Fog Index MD&A readability
22.44
Obfuscatory prose
8 threshold ≥ 18 = murky 24
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

Arista's 2025 figures look strong on their face: revenue, operating income, net income and operating cash flow all rose, and operating cash flow was 1.25 times net income, meaning reported profit was backed by cash in the year. The forensic scores add context. The Beneish M-Score is -2.246, which the label places below the -1.78 threshold and outside the elevated manipulation-risk zone. In plain English, the standard model did not flag the company for closer review. That is a screen, not proof that the numbers are accurate. The Altman Z-double-prime score of 8.46 falls in the safe zone, meaning the model sees low distress risk from the balance sheet, not a forecast of future performance. The Piotroski F-Score is 6 of 8 computable signals, a count of standard profitability, leverage and efficiency checks, where only 8 could be computed from the data here. It is a broad health check, not a grade. The Fog Index of 22.44 falls in the very hard to read band, so the MD&A requires patience from a general reader. The filings also describe legal and regulatory exposures: GDPR fines of up to four percent of prior-year annual revenue or 20 million euros, whichever is higher; UK fines of up to the greater of 17.5 million British pounds or four percent of prior-year revenue; export-control and sanctions risk; and IRS audit exposure. The 10-Q excerpt says management does not currently anticipate a material effect on the effective tax rate from the OECD and California changes, but it cannot rule one out. Readers may want to look at the supplier liabilities note and the full liabilities breakdown in the 10-K.

Catalyst.Per the 10-K for 2025, Arista's revenue reached $9.01 billion, up 28.6% from $7 billion in 2024, and operating income rose to $3.86 billion from $2.94 billion. Net income climbed to $3.51 billion from $2.85 billion, and operating cash flow reached $4.37 billion versus $3.71 billion. The MD&A excerpt supplied from the 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2026 focuses on critical accounting estimates, including revenue recognition, inventory valuation and supplier liabilities. In the portion provided, it does not name the specific products or customer programs driving the growth. Readers may want to check the full MD&A for those demand drivers.

Hidden risk.The balance sheet is the tension a casual reader could miss. Total liabilities rose from $4.05 billion at the end of 2024 to $7.08 billion at the end of 2025, a gain of about 75%, while total assets rose about 38% to $19.45 billion and equity rose about 24% to $12.37 billion. The filings supplied do not explain the cause of the liability increase. The risk factors also flag concentrated exposures: some key components come from sole or limited sources of supply, and a limited number of customers account for a substantial portion of revenue. Tariffs and tax-law changes, including OECD Pillar Two and California Senate Bill 122, are cited as possible sources of effective tax rate volatility.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what ANET reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
1.1%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
11.9M
Change since Aug 31
−17.8%
Days to cover
2.5

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against ANET. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Short sellers closed some of their bets: shares sold short fell 17.8% since the Aug 31 report.

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 2.5 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly reports & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Arista Networks filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Aug 5, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-06-30)Period: 2026-06-300
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 4, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-08-04)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Jun 2, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-05-29)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • May 6, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    EDGAR →
  • May 5, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-05-05)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 16, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-05-29)0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 17, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 12, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-02-12)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Nov 4, 2025
    8-K
    Current report (2025-11-04)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →