Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.

AJG Financial Services · Insurance Brokers
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$227.12
Jun 29, 2026
52-week range
$190.75 — $323.25
-30% from high
Market cap
58.4B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
124.0%
P/E
36.8
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Jun 29, 2026

Fairly valued.

Fairly Valued (Neutral) — Filing.fyi's reading derived from the latest 10-K and forensic scores.

Neutral
RED DEEP / 100
Composite Health
AI synthesis · grounded in this ticker's SEC filings · drag to highlight, releases the composer

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.’s 2025 10-K, filed on February 17, 2026, dedicates significant space to its core disclosures. Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” spans 32 pages, from page 35 to 67. This section is where management provides its narrative on the company’s performance, liquidity, and capital resources, offering a detailed perspective on the year ended December 31, 2025. Such an extensive discussion is common for large, complex entities and is intended to give investors context beyond the raw financial statements. Complementing this, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” covers 19 pages, from page 11 to 30, detailing a broad array of potential challenges and uncertainties inherent to the business model. The sheer volume dedicated to these critical sections suggests a comprehensive attempt at disclosing the operational landscape and inherent risks facing the company.

A key observation from this filing is the absence of calculated forensic scores, which means an automated layer of quantitative scrutiny is not available for this particular reading. Beneish’s M-Score, a 1999 eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector, is not provided, thus preventing an immediate assessment of potential accounting distortions. Similarly, Altman’s Z″, a 1968 bankruptcy-distress index, is unavailable, leaving the question of financial distress unaddressed by this specific metric. Piotroski’s F-Score, a 9-point fundamental strength scan, also lacks a value, precluding a quick gauge of the company’s operational and financial health. Finally, the Fog Index, a readability score where 12 equals newspaper and 18+ suggests obfuscation, is likewise not present, which means the textual complexity of the filing cannot be automatically evaluated. The collective absence of these metrics restricts an immediate, quantitative assessment of potential accounting anomalies or textual clarity.

Given the limited direct excerpts, the structural elements of the filing become the primary focus. The 32 pages allocated to Item 7, the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, underscore its importance as the venue for management’s perspective. This section is crucial for understanding the drivers behind reported financial figures, including revenue recognition, cost structures, and cash flow generation, particularly for a company in the Financial Services sector. While specific details from this section are not provided, its length indicates a thorough, if not exhaustive, explanation of the company’s financial narrative. Furthermore, the filing includes Item 9A, “Controls and Procedures,” on page 127, a standard disclosure addressing the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting, which is a key component of financial statement reliability.

This reading, constrained by the provided excerpts and the unavailability of forensic scores, offers limited insight into the specific financial health or operational intricacies of Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. It can confirm the filing’s structural characteristics, such as the substantial length of the MD&A and Risk Factors sections, which suggests detailed disclosure. However, without access to the full financial statements, detailed footnotes, or the calculated forensic metrics, a comprehensive assessment of potential red flags, fundamental strength, or the clarity of the prose is not possible. Therefore, this analysis cannot determine whether the security is mispriced, as that requires a deeper dive into the complete filing and broader market context. For a complete understanding, the full 2025 10-K, filed February 17, 2026, must be consulted.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Filing timeline

View all on EDGAR →
  • Apr 30, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-04-30)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Mar 23, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-05-12)0
    Read →
  • Mar 17, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-03-17)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Mar 12, 2026
    8-K
    Material event (2026-03-06)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    Read →
  • Feb 17, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    Read →
  • Nov 10, 2025
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2025-09-30)Period: 2025-09-300
    Read →
Member feature · Custom Q&A
Ask anything about AJG's filings.
Plain-English answer, cited from the company's own 10-K and recent 10-Qs. No buy/sell advice.
Ask a question →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →
Quality of Earnings

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →