Automatic Data Processing, Inc.

ADP Technology · Software - Application
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$285.65
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$188.16 — $289.80
-1% from high
Market cap
113.2B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
2.4%
P/E
26.1
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Deep value.

ADP grew revenue 7% to $21.95 billion as long-term debt reached $4.96 billion.

Bullish Beneish: -2.63Piotroski: 4/9Fog: 17.2
RED DEEP 76 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.63
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
4
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
Fog Index MD&A readability
17.17
Dense
8 threshold ≥ 18 = murky 24
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The filings show a company with growing revenue, rising earnings, and substantial cash generation, but the balance sheet and revenue mix call for a closer read. The Beneish M-Score is -2.303, which is below -1.78 and therefore not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone; this is a screening result, not proof that the numbers are accurate. The Altman Z-Score is 2.36, which falls in the grey zone between 1.81 and 2.99, meaning it sits between the distress and safe thresholds and warrants attention rather than a clear signal either way. The Piotroski F-Score is 5 of 8 computable signals, a middling reading that indicates mixed year-over-year financial strength across the signals that could be computed. The Fog Index of 17.17 is in the hard to read band, which matters because the MD&A is the main place management explains the pass-through and interest income items. Management describes the financial condition as solid and says the company generates sufficient free cash flow to cover its dividend and modest debt obligations. The filing supports the cash generation claim, with operating cash flow up about 10% to $5.44 billion. However, the debt picture is less modest than the narrative implies: long-term debt rose by about $990 million in one year, and the filing ties part of the increase to senior notes issued in fiscal 2026 and 2025. Revenue growth also includes zero-margin benefits pass-throughs, which add to revenue without adding margin. Readers may want to look at the risk factors section, the non-GAAP reconciliation, and the discussion of client funds to see how much of the growth depends on interest rates and client balances rather than on core HCM demand.

Catalyst.Fiscal 2026 revenue was $21,947.4 million, up 7% from $20,560.9 million, or 6% on an organic constant currency basis. Management cites new business from bookings, strong client revenue retention, pricing, and higher zero-margin benefits pass-throughs of $318.3 million. Interest on funds held for clients rose to $1,354.8 million from $1,189.1 million, as average client funds grew 7.4% to $40.4 billion and the average rate rose to 3.4% from 3.2%. Net income reached $4.41 billion versus $4.08 billion, and diluted EPS was $10.94, up 10%. The MD&A points to ADP Assist, ADP Lyric HCM, and the ADP WorkForce Suite as growth drivers. ES new business bookings grew 6%, and ES client revenue retention was 92.1%.

Hidden risk.A large share of revenue growth depends on client fund balances and interest rates. Interest on funds held for clients was $1,354.8 million in fiscal 2026, and the filing notes that changes in interest rates can affect results. Long-term debt rose to $4.96 billion from $3.97 billion, while total liabilities reached $57.16 billion against equity of $6.03 billion, down from $6.19 billion. Operating cash flow of $5.44 billion divided by net income of $4.41 billion gives a ratio of 1.23. The Fog Index of 17.17 places the MD&A in the hard to read band of 14 to 18, so the risk discussion may be harder to follow than the headline numbers suggest.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what ADP reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
3.1%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
11M
Change since Aug 31
+1.6%
Days to cover
4.9

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against ADP. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (+1.6%).

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 4.9 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual reports, quarterly report & proxy statement

The annual reports (10-K), quarterly report (10-Q), proxy statements (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Automatic Data Processing filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Sep 24, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-11-11)0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 5, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2026-06-30)Period: 2026-06-300
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 29, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-07-29)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Jun 26, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-06-26)Item 1.01: Signed a material agreement; Item 2.03: New debt or other financial obligation0
    EDGAR →
  • May 7, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-05-04)Item 1.01: Signed a material agreement; Item 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 30, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-03-31)Period: 2026-03-310
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 29, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-29)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Jan 28, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-01-28)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Nov 17, 2025
    8-K
    Current report (2025-11-12)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 25, 2025
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2025-11-12)0
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 6, 2025
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-06-30)Period: 2025-06-300
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →