Accenture plc

ACN Technology · Information Technology Services
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$224.92
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$118.15 — $291.09
-23% from high
Market cap
137.6B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
3.0%
P/E
16.6
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Deep value.

FY2025 revenue and cash flow rose, but AI could erode consulting demand.

Bullish Beneish: -2.59Altman Z″: 3.91Piotroski: 4/9Fog: 20.8
RED DEEP 77 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.59
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
3.91
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
4
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
Fog Index MD&A readability
20.82
Obfuscatory prose
8 threshold ≥ 18 = murky 24
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

The numbers show growing reported results and strong cash generation, but the durability of client demand is the main open question. Operating cash flow of $11.47 billion against net income of $7.68 billion gives a ratio of 1.49 for FY2025, meaning cash generation exceeded reported profit. Management's filings describe AI as both an investment area and a competitive threat. The company says it has made significant AI investments and continues to incur significant development and operational costs, while the risk factors warn that clients may develop their own AI capabilities. On the forensic scores, the Beneish M-Score is -2.587, which is not in the elevated manipulation-risk zone. That is a screening result, not proof that the numbers are clean, and it does not replace reading the notes. The Altman Z″-Score is 3.91, which falls in the safe zone. The Piotroski F-Score is 5 of 7 computable signals, meaning five of the seven signals the model could compute were favorable. The Fog Index is 20.82, which the readability band labels very hard to read. That matters because the MD&A excerpt is dense and largely procedural, so readers may want to look at the full MD&A and Note 11 on legal contingencies, whose contents are not in the excerpt. Capital allocation is active. The remaining authorization for share purchases was $3,244 million as of May 31, 2026, out of $59.1 billion authorized since August 2001. The debt facts in the excerpt are limited to the two credit agreements dated April 22, 2026, without outstanding balances, so no leverage conclusion is drawn. Equity rose to $31.2 billion from $28.29 billion. The 10-Q states there were no material changes to market risk or to risk factors since the 10-K. Readers may want to compare the 10-K risk factor list with later quarterly results to see whether the AI pressure described there appears in revenue growth.

Catalyst.Per the FY2025 annual figures, revenue rose to $69.67 billion from $64.9 billion, a 7.4% increase. Operating income reached $10.23 billion versus $9.6 billion, and net income reached $7.68 billion versus $7.26 billion. Operating cash flow climbed to $11.47 billion from $9.13 billion. The 10-Q excerpt for the nine months ended May 31, 2026 is largely procedural and does not describe segment or growth drivers, so the reasons behind the revenue increase are not established in the text provided. The filings do show capital activity: in the third quarter of fiscal 2026 the company bought 5,754,179 Class A shares under its open-market program for $1,147 million, and on April 22, 2026 it entered a Five-Year Credit Agreement and a 364-Day Credit Agreement with Bank of America as administrative agent.

Hidden risk.The risk factors describe AI as a threat to the revenue model, not only an opportunity. The 10-K says some services performed by people have been and will continue to be replaced by automation, including AI-enabled solutions, which may reduce demand and lower professional utilization. Many consulting contracts run under 12 months and can be terminated on as little as 30 days' notice, and a small number of clients can account for a significant portion of a market's revenue. Separately, total assets rose to $65.39 billion from $55.93 billion, an increase of about 16.9%, faster than the 7.4% revenue growth. Readers may want to look at what drove that gap in the full balance sheet.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what ACN reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
3.6%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
19.7M
Change since Aug 31
−22.4%
Days to cover
3.8

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against ACN. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Short sellers closed some of their bets: shares sold short fell 22.4% since the Aug 31 report.

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 3.8 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Quarterly reports & proxy statement

The quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Accenture filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Oct 14, 2026
    8-K
    Current reportItem 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • Oct 1, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-10-01)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Jul 10, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-07-10)Item 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Jun 23, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-06-23)Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)0
    EDGAR →
  • Jun 18, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-05-31)Period: 2026-05-310
    EDGAR →
  • Apr 24, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-04-22)Item 1.01: Signed a material agreement0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 19, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-02-28)Period: 2026-02-280
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 19, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-03-19)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Jan 28, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-01-28)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors; Item 5.07: Shareholder vote results0
    EDGAR →
  • Dec 18, 2025
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2025-11-30)Period: 2025-11-300
    EDGAR →
  • Dec 18, 2025
    8-K
    Current report (2025-12-18)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Dec 12, 2025
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-01-28)0
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →