Airbnb, Inc.

ABNB Consumer Cyclical · Travel Services
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$174.28
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$110.81 — $193.45
-10% from high
Market cap
104.4B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
—
No dividend declared
P/E
39.7
Trailing
Verdict status · Oct 16, 2026

Not yet scored

Filing.fyi has not computed forensic scores for ABNB yet. Scores appear after the company's next data refresh.

No verdict yet
RED DEEP Scores pending shown after the next data refresh
Composite Health
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · wry-editorial preset

Airbnb’s 2025 10-K, filed in February 2026, presents an Item 7 (MD&A) that begins with the customary disclaimers. The discussion explicitly states, “Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any period in the future.” This boilerplate language, while standard, serves as a reminder that the forward-looking statements within the document are subject to various factors and uncertainties. Readers are directed to review the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 and the comprehensive Risk Factors section for a complete understanding of the company’s financial condition and operational outlook.

The usual forensic accounting metrics, which often provide a quantitative lens into a company’s financial health, are not available for this reading. This includes the Beneish M-Score (Beneish, 1999), an eight-ratio earnings-manipulation detector. Similarly, Altman’s Z″ (Altman, 1968), a bankruptcy-distress index, and Piotroski’s F-Score (Piotroski, 2000), a 9-point fundamental strength scan, are not provided. The Fog Index (Gunning, 1952), a readability score where 18+ indicates obfuscation, is also absent, precluding an assessment of the filing’s textual clarity.

Item 7 of the MD&A further clarifies that “Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements,” underscoring the inherent uncertainty in projections. The Item 1A (Risk Factors) section, while not detailed in the excerpts, is structured to address specific areas such as “Cybersecurity” (Item 1C) and “Legal Proceedings” (Item 3). This organizational structure indicates that the company acknowledges a range of potential challenges, which are typically elaborated upon in the full filing to provide context for the forward-looking statements made in the MD&A.

This reading, constrained by the provided excerpts and the absence of computed forensic scores, offers limited insight into Airbnb’s operational specifics or financial performance. It highlights the standard disclosure practices within the MD&A and the structured approach to risk factor identification. However, without access to the actual financial figures, detailed risk narratives, or the quantitative forensic metrics, the filing cannot inform a comprehensive view on the company’s fundamental strength or potential for accounting irregularities. A full review of the complete 10-K is necessary for such an assessment.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what ABNB reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
3.7%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
15.2M
Change since Aug 31
+6.6%
Days to cover
3.0

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against ABNB. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (+6.6%).

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 3.0 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly report & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly report (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Airbnb filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Apr 24, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-06-05)0
    EDGAR →
  • Mar 16, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-03-12)Item 1.01: Signed a material agreement; Item 8.01: Other events0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 12, 2026
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-12-31)Period: 2025-12-310
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 12, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-02-12)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Nov 21, 2025
    8-K
    Current report (2025-11-18)No specific items found in 8-K.0
    EDGAR →
  • Nov 6, 2025
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2025-09-30)Period: 2025-09-300
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →