Apple Inc.
AAPL Technology · Consumer ElectronicsDeep value.
Apple's sales growth is strong, but rising component costs could squeeze margins ahead.
The four readings.
What the filing actually says.
The scores point in different directions, so readers may want to look at each one separately. The Beneish M-Score is -2.247, below -1.78, and its label places it outside the elevated manipulation-risk zone. That is a screening result for fiscal 2025, not proof either way. The Altman Z-Score of 12.53 is in the safe zone, which describes low modeled distress risk for a non-financial company like Apple. The Piotroski F-Score is 8 of 9 computable signals, a checklist of profitability, leverage and efficiency tests that Apple passes on most measures. The Fog Index of 20.77 is in the very hard to read band, so the MD&A takes more effort than typical filings. The balance sheet shows equity rising to $73.73 billion from $56.95 billion and long-term debt falling to $78.33 billion from $85.75 billion. Yet operating cash flow of $111.48 billion trailed net income of $112.01 billion, a ratio of 1.00, and it fell from $118.25 billion. The risk factors add concentration: sales outside the U.S. are a majority of total net sales, and manufacturing is located primarily in China mainland, India, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam, with single or limited sources for many critical components. The third-quarter Products gross margin of 40.1% compares with 34.5% a year earlier, but management says component cost pressure will intensify. Readers may want to compare future margin figures with the operating cash flow line.
Catalyst.Growth is coming mainly from iPhone and Services. In the first nine months of fiscal 2026, net sales rose 16% to $364.4 billion from $313.7 billion, with iPhone up 22% to $196.5 billion and Services up 14% to $91.7 billion. Greater China net sales rose 30% to $64.8 billion, which management attributes primarily to higher iPhone sales. Products gross margin percentage was 39.9% for the nine months, up from 36.9%. For fiscal 2025, revenue was $416.16 billion, up 6.4% from $391.04 billion, and net income was $112.01 billion, up from $93.74 billion. Management also points to the iOS 27 software launch and the introduction of Siri AI as part of the current product cycle.
Hidden risk.The MD&A states that supply constraints and rising costs for advanced semiconductors, NAND storage and DRAM memory are expected to intensify and may materially hurt revenue, costs and gross margin. It also says price increases used to offset those costs may reduce demand. Tariff exposure remains open, since further Section 232 semiconductor actions are still possible. The Supreme Court tariff refund is recognized as a reduction of cost of sales, which supports current margins but is not a recurring operating source of profit. Fiscal 2025 operating cash flow fell to $111.48 billion from $118.25 billion even as net income rose, and the MD&A has a Fog Index of 20.77, which is very hard to read.
What traders are betting.
The metric
Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.
- Shares sold short
- 120.8M
- Change since Aug 31
- −13.6%
- Days to cover
- 2.8
What it tells us
Few traders are betting against AAPL. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.
Short sellers closed some of their bets: shares sold short fell 13.6% since the Aug 31 report.
At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 2.8 days to buy back every borrowed share.
How investors use it
- Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
- Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
- Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
- Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.
The metric
Calls pay off if the shares rise; puts pay off if they fall. Working an option's price backward through a pricing model gives its implied volatility: the size of swings traders are paying for. Open interest counts contracts still open.
- Implied volatility
- 27% a year
- Actual volatility, past month
- 16% a year
- Open puts per open call
- 0.80
- Puts per call traded Oct 15
- 1.03
- Downside puts vs upside calls
- 30% vs 25%
What it tells us
Option prices imply that a move of about ±7.7% either way by Nov 13 would be ordinary for AAPL. If the pricing model's assumptions hold, the shares end that period inside this range about two times out of three. It measures the size of a likely move, not its direction.
Traders are paying for bigger swings than the stock has made over the past month. That often happens ahead of an earnings report or another known event, or when traders are nervous.
Open puts and calls are roughly balanced (0.80 puts for every call).
Protection against a drop costs a little more than a bet on a rise, which is normal for stocks.
How investors use it
- Protection. Owners buy puts as insurance: if the shares fall, the puts gain; if not, the premium paid is the cost of cover.
- Income. Owners sell covered calls to collect premiums, giving up any gain above the strike.
- Volatility trades. Funds sell options when implied volatility looks rich, collecting premiums but facing heavy losses in a sudden crash. Others buy options, paying small premiums for large payoffs in rare big moves.
- Betting on a fall without shorting. Traders who expect a decline buy puts, risking only the premium instead of the open-ended loss of a short sale.
Quarterly reports & proxy statement
The quarterly reports (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Apple filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.
- Sep 1, 20268-K/ACurrent report (amended)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directorsEDGAR →★ Curriculum-relevant
- Jul 31, 202610-QQuarterly report (2026-06-27)Period: 2026-06-270EDGAR →
- Jul 30, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-07-30)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0EDGAR →
- May 1, 202610-QQuarterly report (2026-03-28)Period: 2026-03-280EDGAR →
- Apr 30, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-04-30)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0EDGAR →
- Apr 20, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-04-17)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors0EDGAR →
- Feb 24, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-02-24)Item 5.07: Shareholder vote results0EDGAR →
- Jan 30, 202610-QQuarterly report (2025-12-27)Period: 2025-12-270EDGAR →
- Jan 29, 20268-KCurrent report (2026-01-29)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0EDGAR →
- Jan 8, 2026DEF 14AProxy statement (2026-02-24)0EDGAR →
- Jan 2, 20268-KCurrent report (2025-12-30)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors0EDGAR →
- Dec 5, 20258-KCurrent report (2025-12-04)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors0EDGAR →
What the desk read this week
- Dow Jones Futures: Tech Stocks, Oil Prices Rise Amid Iran News; Apple, Amazon, Google Lead Earnings
- John Ternus, Apple’s new CEO, inherits a rebounding China business—and some messy headaches
- Apple (AAPL) Set to Report Earnings Amid Tech Sector Rally - GuruFocus
- Does a Merger With iHeartRadio Make Sirius Stock a Buy?
- Apple Inc. (AAPL) Announces Leadership Change as Tim Cook Steps Down - GuruFocus
- What’s next for Apple after Tim Cook’s CEO transition announcement? (AAPL:NASDAQ) - Seeking Alpha
- Apple Inc. (AAPL) Appointed John Ternus as CEO - Yahoo Finance
- AAPL stock slides as iPhone-maker faces modest App Store growth in Q1 – retail says 'great opportunity' to buy more - MSN
- Fund Update: New $277.2M $AAPL stock position opened by OPPENHEIMER & CO INC - Quiver Quantitative
- Apple Is Getting a New Chief Hardware Officer. What Does That Mean for AAPL Stock? - Yahoo Finance
If this case caught your eye
Financial Shenanigans
Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.
View on Amazon →The Interpretation of Financial Statements
The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.
View on Amazon →Quality of Earnings
Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.
View on Amazon →