Agilent Technologies, Inc.

A Healthcare · Diagnostics & Research
Delayed 15 min
Last close
$175.55
Oct 16, 2026
52-week range
$108.35 — $177.05
-1% from high
Market cap
49.5B
Diluted basis
Dividend yield
0.6%
P/E
34.6
Trailing
Filing.fyi verdict · Oct 16, 2026

Fairly valued.

Revenue grew 6.7% in fiscal 2025, but operating income slipped and operating cash flow fell.

Neutral Beneish: -2.46Altman Z″: 3.48Piotroski: 5/9Fog: 22.2
RED DEEP 67 / 100
Composite Health
Forensic readings · derived from the latest filing

The four readings.

Each score answers a different question. The composite at the top is the average; the disagreement below is the story.
Beneish M Earnings manipulation
-2.46
Clean
−3.0 threshold −1.78 +1.0
Altman Z″ Bankruptcy proximity
3.48
Safe
0 threshold 1.10 / 2.60 4.0
Piotroski F Fundamental health (0–9)
5
Mixed
0 threshold 6+ 9
Fog Index MD&A readability
22.21
Obfuscatory prose
8 threshold ≥ 18 = murky 24
AI synthesis · written from this company's SEC filings · not investment advice

What the filing actually says.

AI · forensic preset

Read together, the scores describe a company whose reported figures pass the main screens, while the narrative leans on growth and savings that a careful reader should test. The Beneish M-Score is -2.464, which is below the -1.78 threshold and so sits outside the elevated manipulation-risk zone. This is a screening output, not proof that the figures are accurate; it only means the model did not flag them. The Altman Z-Score is 6.09, which falls in the safe zone and suggests low near-term distress risk on the 2025 balance sheet. The Piotroski F-Score is 6 of 8 computable signals, meaning six of the standard checks on profitability, leverage and operating efficiency that could be computed were passed; the data does not show which two were not computable. The Fog Index of 22.21 is in the very hard to read band, so the MD&A's discussion of restructuring, hedging and critical estimates takes more effort to follow than a typical filing. Segment detail in the 10-Q shows Life Sciences and Diagnostics Markets up 9% for the nine months, Agilent CrossLab up 7%, and Applied Markets up 9%. Fiscal 2025 revenue growth of 6.7% and operating cash flow to net income of 1.20 are consistent with reported profit, but operating income edged down to $1.48 billion from $1.49 billion. Readers may want to look at the full Item 1A risk factors, because the excerpt provided is mostly a table of contents and does not show the company's own list of risks, and at the Agilent Advanced Therapeutics disclosures, which the MD&A cites as a leading growth driver.

Catalyst.Management's MD&A, covering the nine months ended July 31, 2026, reports total net revenue of $5.51 billion, up 8% from $5.09 billion a year earlier. Growth was led by product revenue, specifically Agilent Advanced Therapeutics (formerly the specialty CDMO business), consumables, and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Currency added a 2 percentage point favorable impact over the nine months, so part of the reported growth did not come from underlying demand. The Life Sciences and Diagnostics Markets segment rose 9% for the nine months, with pharmaceutical and diagnostics strength partly offset by declines in academia and government. Restructuring expense for the nine months was $43 million, down from $74 million a year earlier, and management expects the FY26 plan to reduce annual costs by $30 million to $35 million.

Hidden risk.Two restructuring plans in consecutive fiscal years suggest cost reductions are recurring rather than one-time, even though the filing frames them as management optimization. The FY25 plan has carried $109 million of expense since inception and the FY26 plan $15 million. Long-term debt rose from $1.79 billion in 2019 to $3.35 billion in 2024 before falling to $3.05 billion in 2025, against total liabilities of $5.99 billion and assets of $12.73 billion. Operating cash flow fell from $1.75 billion in 2024 to $1.56 billion in 2025 while net income rose to $1.3 billion. Cash flow still exceeded net income at 1.20 times, but the gap narrowed. The MD&A also names goodwill and purchased intangible asset valuation as a critical accounting estimate, and its Fog Index of 22.21 places it in the very hard to read band, which makes those estimates harder to check.

Market signals · from trading data, not filings

What traders are betting.

The scores above come from what A reports to the SEC. These readings come from how traders are positioned in its shares. They change quickly, they can be wrong, and they are not part of the verdict.
Short interest Shares sold short · reported twice a month
2.1%
of the shares available to trade
Low
0%5% · 10% · 20%25%+

The metric

Shares that traders have borrowed and sold, betting the price will fall, and not yet bought back. Brokers report the total to FINRA twice a month. Days to cover divides it by the shares that change hands on a typical day.

Shares sold short
5.2M
Change since Aug 31
−7.7%
Days to cover
2.1

What it tells us

Few traders are betting against A. Levels this low are common for large, widely held companies.

Little changed since the Aug 31 report (−7.7%).

At normal trading volume, short sellers would need about 2.1 days to buy back every borrowed share.

How investors use it

  • Squeeze watching. Some aggressive traders seek out heavily shorted stocks, betting that good news will force short sellers to buy back shares and push the price higher.
  • Hedging. Funds short one company to offset risk in another, often owning a stronger business and shorting a weaker one in the same industry.
  • Timing. Chart-based traders pair rising short interest with price patterns, such as a break below a level where buyers used to step in, to decide when to enter or exit.
  • Warning sign. Some owners treat a sharp rise in short interest as a red flag and respond by tightening stop-loss orders or holding smaller positions.

Lesson: short interest, explained →

Short-interest report for Sep 30, 2026, via Yahoo Finance. Reports come out about a week and a half after that date.

SEC filings · last 12 months

Annual report, quarterly report & proxy statement

The annual report (10-K), quarterly report (10-Q), proxy statement (DEF 14A) and current reports (8-K) Agilent Technologies filed in the last 12 months, each linked to the original document on SEC EDGAR.

  • Sep 8, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-09-02)Item 5.02: Departure/appointment of officers or directors; Item 7.01: Regulation FD disclosure (investor materials)
    ★ Curriculum-relevant
    EDGAR →
  • Sep 1, 2026
    10-Q
    Quarterly report (2026-07-31)Period: 2026-07-310
    EDGAR →
  • Aug 26, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-08-26)Item 2.02: Results of operations (earnings)0
    EDGAR →
  • Jun 25, 2026
    8-K
    Current report (2026-06-25)Unknown Item hereby incorporated by reference into this...0
    EDGAR →
  • Feb 6, 2026
    DEF 14A
    Proxy statement (2026-03-18)0
    EDGAR →
  • Dec 22, 2025
    10-K
    Annual report (2025-10-31)Period: 2025-10-310
    EDGAR →
Further reading · curated for this filing

If this case caught your eye

Affiliate links — Filing.fyi earns a commission on Amazon purchases. We pick the books first, attach the link second.

Financial Shenanigans

Howard M. Schilit

Schilit's framework for the seven shenanigan types is the standard reference for the kind of MD&A pattern-matching this site does.

View on Amazon →

The Interpretation of Financial Statements

Benjamin Graham

The original — and still the clearest — explanation of why working-capital trends matter more than headline earnings.

View on Amazon →

Quality of Earnings

Thornton L. O'glove

Out of print, expensive, worth it. The chapter on receivables-vs-revenue divergence applies almost word-for-word to most distressed filings.

View on Amazon →